http://www.emode.com/tests/jumpto?test=evil Apparently I'm a walking-talking Disney movie. And I'm ridiculously good. That's no fun.
I'm not nearly as nutty as a fruitcake :-(
In my past life I was a dog
I am guilty of sloth
And, apparently, my IQ is 127, but I've no idea where that fits on some sort of scale. Stupid emode.
Take a look at this. It's a nice little rant that that comes from someone who doesn't even appear to be a slasher . It's nicely put; while it does rehash some old stuff, she's put forward some points that I've never thought of before, such as: Why is there no male equivalent of 'fag hag'? Don't be discouraged by the apparent focus on comics.
Also, I saw A Beautiful Thing today. What a sweet, sweet movie, I'm such a sucker for a nice angsty love story. That's also the second of my four wishlist movies:
Velvet Goldmine- yay for the goldmine.
A Beautiful Thing - awwwwwwness
Cemetary Man - Rupert Everett battling zombies, what's not to like? Unfortunately, I think it's in Italian which basically means I'll never find it.
Dark Harbour - Alan Rickman snogs another man, what's not to like? *g* Sorry, lainy *eg*
I'm not nearly as nutty as a fruitcake :-(
In my past life I was a dog
I am guilty of sloth
And, apparently, my IQ is 127, but I've no idea where that fits on some sort of scale. Stupid emode.
Take a look at this. It's a nice little rant that that comes from someone who doesn't even appear to be a slasher . It's nicely put; while it does rehash some old stuff, she's put forward some points that I've never thought of before, such as: Why is there no male equivalent of 'fag hag'? Don't be discouraged by the apparent focus on comics.
Also, I saw A Beautiful Thing today. What a sweet, sweet movie, I'm such a sucker for a nice angsty love story. That's also the second of my four wishlist movies:
Cemetary Man - Rupert Everett battling zombies, what's not to like? Unfortunately, I think it's in Italian which basically means I'll never find it.
Dark Harbour - Alan Rickman snogs another man, what's not to like? *g* Sorry, lainy *eg*
mmm
Date: 2002-03-27 11:33 pm (UTC)Re: mmm
Date: 2002-03-28 03:11 pm (UTC)SD determines how "spread out" the non-average scores are, how much they *deviate* from the average
tossing a coin many many times, adding a zero for each tail and a one for each head, eventually a Guassian distribution should emerge, with 1/2 times the number of tosses as the approximate median and approximate mean (average)
then, checking the distribution, one could see how rare it would be to get at least 8 heads out of 10 consecutive tosses
the pretense is that IQ scores follow strict Gaussian distribution (a particular pattern associated with a certain type of randomness), which is simply incorrect
for that matter, median and average are NOT identical, so on a given test the average could be 100 but the 50th%ile, or most NORMAL score, could be, say 104
the whole idea of an IQ above 100 in an adult should be scrapped in favor of a percentile
an adult score of 120 with a SD of 16 means nothing more or less than "90%ile" (top one in ten) -- the 20 is an arbitrary number, and if the SD were changed to 48, the 120 magically becomes 160, ta dah, with the same meaning -- "90th%ile"
an adult who scores 150 on an IQ test with a SD of 16 knows nothing more than that he scored at approximatedly the 99.9th%ile (top one in one thousand) -- without knowledge of the SD, the 150 becomes "something well above average"